On my own behalf and on behalf of Unite, I couldn’t have been more pleased than to have been asked to say a few words at this event last night: the launch of ‘Per­son­al Jour­neys in an Unequal City’, held in the Fire Sta­tion Artist Stu­dios on Buck­ing­ham Street in Dublin’s North Inner City.

Here’s what I had to say:

When I first got to read ‘The Sys­tem­at­ic Destruc­tion of the Com­mu­ni­ty Devel­op­ment, Anti-Pover­ty and Equal­i­ty Move­ment by Patri­cia Kelle­her and Cath­leen O’Neill last Autumn it was a real wake-up call. This sem­i­nal work described how the 1980s and the 1990s saw the emer­gence of a vibrant state-fund­ed com­mu­ni­ty move­ment. and how this has been dis­placed since 2002 with what Cath­leen and Patri­cia describe as ‘a shift from par­tic­i­pa­to­ry democ­ra­cy to neolib­er­al­ism’.

The book being launched tonight, ‘Per­son­al Jour­neys in an Unequal City’, car­ries the reflec­tions on this peri­od – and what has hap­pened since – of eleven peo­ple with such a breadth of expe­ri­ence in the com­mu­ni­ty sec­tor that a per­ma­nent record of the work done, the suc­cess­es, the fail­ures, the changes and the chal­lenges is essen­tial.

When I say essen­tial I am not refer­ring sim­ply to record­ing these expe­ri­ences for pos­ter­i­ty and his­tor­i­cal accu­ra­cy. While such an endeav­our would be wor­thy in and of itself, the issues addressed in the book are of more impor­tance than that.

The issues that need to be addressed in our work­ing class com­mu­ni­ties can, I think, be broad­ly cap­tured under the head­ing of ‘equal­i­ty’.

In the book Peter McVer­ry talks about how it was reck­oned in the 1970s that there were 1000 home­less peo­ple in Ire­land, and how they were most­ly mid­dle aged men with drink prob­lems. Today we have over 10,000 record­ed home­less cit­i­zens and many more ‘hid­den home­less’; they are dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly young and many are entire fam­i­lies with chil­dren.

In work pover­ty is now ‘a thing’. Under-employ­ment has replaced un-employ­ment and for many of our young, my own chil­dren too, the future is more uncer­tain than ever. More ‘pre­car­i­ous’. Will young peo­ple get secure work, with wages that they can live on, buy a house or pay rent on, rear a fam­i­ly on? We all know that in most work­ing class com­mu­ni­ties these essen­tials have become rare things.

Equal­i­ty has many facets. Some would point to a more per­mis­si­ble soci­ety as signs of pos­i­tive social change. We have had ref­er­en­da on divorce, mar­riage equal­i­ty and the Eighth Amend­ment, and our gov­ern­ment takes the inter­na­tion­al plau­dits for these changes, the gush­ing recip­i­ent of gar­lands of con­grat­u­la­tion. But what­ev­er about your per­son­al views on those issues where is our ECONOMIC EQUALITY? It seems to me the Gov­ern­ment are say­ing to us ‘do what you want in your per­son­al pri­vate lives, but demand eco­nom­ic equal­i­ty and we’ll crush you. Know your place!’

As a Trade Union­ist, the con­sid­er­a­tion of the empow­er­ment of a com­mu­ni­ty move­ment in the 1980s and 1990s pos­es a real chal­lenge for me. As I read the book I learned a lot. For exam­ple, thanks to Anna Quigley I learned that there is actu­al­ly such a thing as a ‘good SCAB’, this is BIG NEWS! – in this case its full title is a ‘Small Com­mu­ni­ty Ameni­ty Build­ing’, as Anna records.

But I also learned that the very years that I as a Trade Union­ist had writ­ten off as an unmit­i­gat­ed dis­as­ter – the ‘social part­ner­ship’ years of the 1980s and 1990s – were the very years many of the con­trib­u­tors refer to as the gold­en peri­od for vital and nec­es­sary com­mu­ni­ty devel­op­ment and empow­er­ment.

How could this be?

To me those were the years when the Trade Union move­ment engaged in a vol­un­tary peri­od of dis­em­pow­er­ing itself and dis­ad­van­tag­ing our class, when it with­drew from the fray of fight­ing employ­ers on behalf of work­ers and instead became ‘the work­ers police­men’. Indus­tri­al peace was trad­ed for mod­er­ate pay increas­es and tax cuts, cuts that would ulti­mate­ly hol­low out many of the pub­lic ser­vices in health, edu­ca­tion and hous­ing that the work­ing class itself relies so heav­i­ly on.

Yet par­al­lel to this men and women in this com­mu­ni­ty, and oth­ers, peo­ple of the cal­i­bre of Tony Gre­go­ryMick Raf­fer­tyPauline Kane and Seanie Lambe were work­ing in their com­mu­ni­ties to address drugs issues, crime and inequal­i­ty, hous­ing qual­i­ty and social jus­tice with every fibre of their being.

Seanie cap­tures it per­fect­ly as fol­lows:

‘I stood for elec­tion for the Com­mu­nist Par­ty in 1979. How­ev­er the Gre­go­ry cam­paign seemed far more attrac­tive because they were try­ing to do prac­ti­cal things such as fight­ing for jobs and decent hous­ing con­di­tions, so I start­ed to join up with their activ­i­ties. It became my life, com­mu­ni­ty work’.

(Seanie kept a bit of that com­mu­nism going, I first met him in Havana Cuba in 2006, but jok­ing aside the per­son­al jour­neys and learn­ing in this book are now essen­tial.)

If the gold­en peri­od for com­mu­ni­ty empow­er­ment start­ed to end with the PD/FF Gov­ern­ment of 2002, it drew to a shud­der­ing half in 2008 and 2009. So too did Social Part­ner­ship, not because the Unions left it, but because the Gov­ern­ment kicked them out of Gov­ern­ment build­ings to make way for the Troi­ka.

Here now we had the neolib­er­al jug­ger­naut in full flow. Eco­nom­ic sov­er­eign­ty was gone, they decid­ed that €65 bil­lion of pri­vate spec­u­la­tors’ debt had to be nation­alised – a debt we and future gen­er­a­tions will car­ry to about 2054, swinge­ing job cuts from ‘An Bord Snip Nua’ (they even have a nice Irish name for screw­ing us over), tax ris­es for the major­i­ty, tax breaks for those who bust the coun­try, cuts to pub­lic ser­vices, mass emi­gra­tion. Less hous­es, less ser­vices, less police.

And into that vac­u­um of hope­less­ness and betray­al came the almost total aban­don­ment of the com­mu­ni­ties and the unions who in dif­fer­ent ways had worked with Gov­ern­ment for decades, sac­ri­ficed on the altar of neolib­er­al inequal­i­ty and greed.

Com­mu­ni­ty empow­er­ment has now been bureau­cra­tised and hand­ed over to the state. We now have the best in our com­mu­ni­ties work­ing to pro­vide ser­vices in those com­mu­ni­ties absent of any egal­i­tar­i­an ide­o­log­i­cal frame­work or class analy­sis. Help and aid is con­trolled and reg­u­lat­ed, and pover­ty has gone from being a prob­lem to being an indus­try to make mon­ey from, and off. Wit­ness how the home­less­ness emer­gency is used to enrich the prop­er­ty and land­lord class. Wit­ness how direct pro­vi­sion for vul­ner­a­ble asy­lum seek­ers is a mul­ti-mil­lion Euro indus­try for pri­vate providers.

Anna Quigley puts it bet­ter than I could:

‘I am not real­ly sure how to bal­ance the short term need for emer­gency or reme­di­al action with the long term aim of real social change’.

Peter McVer­ry, a man who inspires so many, speaks plain­ly of the soci­etal prob­lems we now face:

‘I am not opti­mistic about the future because I see no evi­dence that the gov­ern­ment is pre­pared to imple­ment the poli­cies nec­es­sary to build a fair and more equi­table soci­ety.’

Tessie McMa­hon recalls how in the 1970s

‘there was a huge need for adult lit­er­a­cy in the com­mu­ni­ty’.

Behind the ide­o­log­i­cal­ly-dri­ven spin about the ‘knowl­edge econ­o­my’, is it any dif­fer­ent today?

But still I know this. I know while we have peo­ple like TessieAnnaPeterFer­gus McCabeJohn Far­rel­lyMarie Met­calfPauline KaneSeaniePad­dy Mal­oneGer­ry Fay and Mick we have much to cel­e­brate because we have knowl­edge, car­ing, learn­ing and hope.

As they say in culchie land when seek­ing direc­tions:

‘Well, if I was you I wouldn’t start from here’ –  Yet here is where we are.

I am hon­oured and inspired to be read­ing and learn­ing due to the work begun by Patri­cia and Cath­leen pub­lished last Octo­ber. Unite is at the heart of your com­mu­ni­ty just down there in Abbey Street. What can we do to help? Ask us.

Do we need a per­ma­nent evolv­ing ide­o­log­i­cal frame­work – a think tank if you will – to under­pin our future approach to com­mu­ni­ty work?

Unite Com­mu­ni­ty has been devel­oped specif­i­cal­ly because, in the neolib­er­al era, work­ers’ lives are shaped as much by fac­tors out­side of work as inside.

More so.

Think about it? What sort of pay rise would any union have to nego­ti­ate for its mem­bers to pay the rents of the prop­er­ty and land­lord class in this city, let alone to allow them get a mort­gage?

Can Unite Com­mu­ni­ty help?

While we con­sid­er these ques­tions as we go for­ward I want to just pause now and cel­e­brate the peo­ple in this book and in our com­mu­ni­ties who, sor­ry Father, ‘give a shit’, and con­tin­ue to.

Per­son­al Jour­neys in an Unequal City’ is the per­fect title for a book that not only records bril­liant­ly what went before, but that gives us lessons and sign­posts that are bad­ly need­ed in the push for a fair­er more equal Dublin, a fair and more equal Ire­land.

ENDS

Spread the mes­sage