The recent local and Euro­pean elec­tions need to be reflect­ed upon, in terms of where we are at in the hoped for deliv­ery of Ireland’s first pro­gres­sive Gov­ern­ment.

To save time, we need not fall into the trap of over­ly com­pli­cat­ing what such a Gov­ern­ment would do, or how that pro­gres­sion would be defined. A pro­gres­sive Gov­ern­ment would enact poli­cies and address issues in a way which re-dis­trib­uted wealth top down for a change. It would reduce inequal­i­ty, not increase it. It would put pub­lic good above pri­vate inter­ests. And so, Ireland’s first pro­gres­sive Gov­ern­ment would be entire­ly dif­fer­ent to the cur­rent Gov­ern­ment, and rad­i­cal­ly dif­fer­ent to the even worse Fine Gael/Labour admin­is­tra­tion from 2011–2016.

The pol­i­cy plat­form with the prin­ci­ples that such a Gov­ern­ment would fol­low already exists. These prin­ci­ples are not rad­i­cal, unless seen from a far right per­spec­tive, the per­spec­tive of most polit­i­cal and eco­nom­ic com­men­tary in Ire­land. The ten prin­ci­ples at issue are nei­ther extreme, nor unwork­able. On the con­trary, they pro­vide the basis for a broad pop­u­lar front that would bring real reform to our tax base, our pub­lic ser­vices, our envi­ron­men­tal out­look and our fail­ing demo­c­ra­t­ic struc­tures. As recent­ly point­ed out – in ‘The Jour­nal’ no less – the Right2Change pol­i­cy plat­form con­tains all the ideas and prin­ci­ples that could bring much need­ed uni­ty among those who seek it on Ireland’s dys­func­tion­al left. If we stop argu­ing with each oth­er and shoot­ing our­selves in the foot that is.

More­over, they are fis­cal­ly robust. The attached fis­cal strat­e­gy sets out a range of rev­enue rais­ing mea­sures that are mea­sured and even based with­in the cur­rent (flawed and to be reformed) fis­cal rules. The strat­e­gy itself was devel­oped with the assis­tance of the excel­lent Michael Taft.

For those of us hold­ing fast to these prin­ci­ples as a ground up-led evo­lu­tion towards a bet­ter future for all, the recent local elec­tion results seem extreme­ly dis­ap­point­ing. And, viewed through a nar­row per­spec­tive of one elec­tion, they are. I’m not going to list here all the seats lost by all the par­ties who fought on ‘the left’ in that elec­tion. To us pro­gres­sives that infor­ma­tion is already at hand and being assim­i­lat­ed and parsed, as it should be.

Instead it may be pos­si­ble to inter­pret these events through an alto­geth­er more pos­i­tive lens.

Read­ing some books and arti­cles late­ly you could almost for­get that we had an anti-aus­ter­i­ty move­ment here at all; so keen are some to write it out of his­to­ry. But we had. And not just any lit­tle anti-aus­ter­i­ty move­ment either. How­ev­er you define it, the anti-water charges move­ment was the largest long-last­ing protest move­ment in the his­to­ry of the state and, because of this, it won on water, at least for now.

It is cer­tain­ly a fact how­ev­er that, while win­ning on the issue, the move­ment has not to date deliv­ered the nec­es­sary learn­ing, matu­ri­ty and uni­ty to be an ongo­ing move­ment of pro­gres­sive reform beyond that sin­gle issue, at that sin­gle time.

But in a coun­try which has nev­er had a real left Gov­ern­ment, a coun­try always ruled by one of two con­ser­v­a­tive par­ties (and now by both of them) is that not inevitable in this phase? Instead of being dis­cour­aged, is it pos­si­ble that what has hap­pened on the Irish left from 2016 to 2018 is a nec­es­sary part of a polit­i­cal evo­lu­tion that we had to go through?

It strikes me that what hap­pened the water charges move­ment is that one of its three pil­lars (the polit­i­cal pil­lar) broke with the two oth­ers to see could it claim the ground, the num­bers, and the momen­tum of the move­ment for itself. And when I say that, what I real­ly mean is that a bro­ken, splin­tered ‘polit­i­cal pil­lar’ did this in a bro­ken and splin­tered way. There was no one deci­sion, no sin­gle malign influ­ence, no over­ar­ch­ing strat­e­gy. How could there be? No, a num­ber of small com­mit­ted par­ties fol­low­ing relat­ed but sep­a­rate doc­trines instead sought to ‘own’ the water move­ment ‘post 2016’ and turn it to par­ty advan­tage. Was that not inevitable?

In any event, the recent results demon­strate that in every case that strat­e­gy has failed. Prac­ti­cal­ly speak­ing, every par­ty is now in a weak­er posi­tion than it was in 2016 for exam­ple, and work­ing less col­lab­o­ra­tive­ly too. So be it. I sug­gest that this has been a phase that has been as dif­fi­cult as it was inevitable, and it’s now time to move on.

It is cer­tain­ly, unar­guably, the case that the vast major­i­ty of all mem­bers of those dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal par­ties agree on much more than they dis­agree on. So too is that the case in the unions and com­mu­ni­ties that made up the oth­er two pil­lars of that evo­lu­tion­ary move­ment. And this com­mon­al­i­ty must now fill the space left open by the failed sep­a­rate elec­toral strate­gies of the last two years. This com­mon­al­i­ty of prin­ci­pal on most but not all issues is yet a sign for hope, a plat­form for build­ing on, and our sign­post to progress.

As a par­tic­i­pant in the water charges move­ment Unite echoes the calls of some com­men­ta­tors, blog­gers and pod­casts recent­ly for a new respect­ful align­ment behind broad left pol­i­cy areas and prin­ci­ples.

Of course this opti­mism at a time of per­ceived and described defeat does not come with­out cau­tion. It is notable how in recent times some of the voic­es of ‘pro­gres­sives’ who argued so fer­vent­ly for the Irish Labour Par­ty to enter Gov­ern­ment in 2011 are try­ing to use the cur­rent per­ceived car­nage on the left to make the same argu­ments again. And those of us resis­tant to such a course are deemed to some­how be in the wrong, unwill­ing to put the past behind us. The prob­lem with this analy­sis is that it is not hurt, or his­to­ry, or an unwill­ing­ness to for­get betray­al that is the prob­lem. The prob­lem is much more fun­da­men­tal than that. That prob­lem is, in action more than words, the Irish Labour Par­ty is not ‘pro­gres­sive’.

The regres­sive bud­gets of that Fine Gael/Labour Gov­ern­ment are shame­ful. The Labour Par­ty is unre­formed. It is led by Bren­dan Howl­in who joint­ly led the very Depart­ment of Finance that sav­aged the work­ing class and our pub­lic ser­vices for five years. Alan Kel­ly, the cham­pi­on of water charges, wants to be its next leader and the par­ty still sup­ports the intro­duc­tion of domes­tic water charges against all the evi­dence of the Government’s own expert report, and much more. Irish Labour has nei­ther apol­o­gised for, nor acknowl­edged its betray­al, let alone reformed itself in terms of per­son­nel, pol­i­cy, rule or direc­tion. In fact, as even those ‘left­ists’ call­ing for us now to embrace Labour anew acknowl­edge, it stands ready to prop up the next right-wing Gov­ern­ment at the first time of ask­ing. Are we wrong on this? If we are to judge by actions, not words, we are not wrong. And hold­ing fast to these posi­tions until we see actu­al evi­dence of fun­da­men­tal reform is not naïve or back­ward look­ing. It is com­mon sense.

Mind you, for the week that is in it, cred­it where it is due. It was great to see Michael D. Hig­gins putting the cli­mate change denial of Don­ald Trump in focus at an EPSU Con­fer­ence in Dublin this week.

There will be many oth­er blogs, opin­ions and analy­sis and we move for­ward and we in Unite look for­ward to read­ing and con­sid­er­ing them. But the work to build some sort of struc­ture to deliv­er on the Right2Change Pol­i­cy Prin­ci­ples con­tin­ues here in a small way through our ‘Com­mu­ni­ty Tom Stokes Branch’. This sin­gle Branch of just one Union seen four of its mem­bers elect­ed to local coun­cils two weeks ago. Some oth­ers missed out in last count sce­nar­ios, and still more had a first out­ing that they will have learned much from.

Learn­ing, build­ing, and keep­ing hope alive while reach­ing out is per­haps what we all need to do in the weeks and months ahead. It’s not a crime to make a mis­take and get things wrong, as we all do. But it is most unwise not to learn from those mis­takes and even repeat them. Let us see who can come togeth­er, and how, to deliv­er a struc­ture for real change in our peo­ples inter­ests. If not now, when?

Bren­dan Ogle – June 6 2019

Spread the mes­sage