Do you remem­ber the infa­mous ‘Gal­way Tent’? As a sym­bol of the sort of gombeenism that per­tained as the nation was led to penury, the ‘Gal­way Tent’ is a good exam­ple. Basi­cal­ly, Fian­na Fail par­ty fundrais­ers would hire a mar­quee at the Gal­way race fes­ti­val in Ballybrit and invite their friends to enjoy their ‘hos­pi­tal­i­ty’. Here beer and wine would flow, a canape or two maybe, and brown envelopes packed with wads of cash would be hand­ed to the polit­i­cal wor­thies as ‘dona­tions’. €150,000 a year is admit­ted to hav­ing been raised in this way. There were even long wait­ing lists of cash-clad cit­i­zens hop­ing for can­cel­la­tions so that they might get in, get to dine at the ‘top’ table, and also hand over an enve­lope full of ‘green’. Of course no favours were ever asked for, or offered, in exchange for this largesse. That would be cor­rup­tion. In Ire­land? Of course not!

It was stopped in 2008 amid wide­spread pub­lic con­cern. And Ire­land got cleaned up. Didn’t it?

The Stan­dards in Pub­lic Office Com­mis­sion (SIPO) had been estab­lished sev­en years ear­li­er in 2001. Polit­i­cal dona­tions, dis­clo­sure of inter­ests of politi­cians, expen­di­ture of state fund­ing, par­ty lead­ers’ allowances and the like were gen­uine caus­es of pub­lic con­cern in rela­tion to ethics in pub­lic office, and SIPO was estab­lished to deal with these mat­ters. It should also be said that com­mu­ni­ty and vol­un­teer-led cam­paigns, trade union activism and social protest were not gen­uine caus­es of pub­lic con­cern then, or ever (except pos­si­bly in the sense that there wasn’t enough of it), so SIPO were set up to get a han­dle on that which was or con­cern. The hint is in the title. Stan­dards in Pub­lic Office.

Just how well they were doing in this task was revealed on a Prime­time Spe­cial on RTE tele­vi­sion on Mon­day 7th Decem­ber 2015. The show revealed to a star­tled pub­lic the fact that elect­ed politi­cians all over Ire­land, nation­al and local, were fail­ing to prop­er­ly reg­is­ter their inter­ests, as well as false­ly claim­ing expens­es they weren’t enti­tled to. A num­ber were also try­ing, and suc­ceed­ing, to elic­it third par­ty pay­ments to them that shocked view­ers.  Who could ever for­get ex Fine Gael­er, ‘Pock­et­man’ Hugh McIl­l­vaney, being secret­ly record­ed laugh­ing at the very idea that he might be caught doing any­thing wrong. As he pulled out his pock­ets and waved them about to a poten­tial client, he asked ‘what’s in it for me?’, and ‘are you going to pay me by the hour or the job’? And remem­ber Fian­na Fail’s Joe Queenan? Queenan was forced to resign from the par­ty after being secret­ly filmed offer­ing to act as an inter­me­di­ary for a wind farm com­pa­ny in return for an invest­ment in a busi­ness he was plan­ning. The mal­prac­tice was so wide­spread and out of con­trol that a con­trib­u­tor to the show from SIPO itself, Prin­ci­pal Offi­cer Bri­an McK­e­vitt, looked for new pow­ers to reel in such bla­tant cor­rup­tion.

I remem­ber that show, and the date, very well. I remem­ber it because with­in two days SIPO had sum­moned Dave Gib­ney and myself to a meet­ing in their offices in our capac­i­ty as co-ordi­na­tors of the Right2Water cam­paign. It was an extra­or­di­nary meet­ing. The Right2Water cam­paign is not an organ­i­sa­tion in any sense, it is a cam­paign, yet we sat and lis­tened as we were told we had breached all sorts of SIPO reg­u­la­tions and we would have to give the mon­ey spent run­ning the cam­paign back. Now, almost all of the mon­ey spent on Right2Water was from the Right2Water Trade Unions, and Trade Unions are not ‘pub­lic office’ hold­ers. They are trade unions which are ‘friend­ly soci­eties’ of mem­bers reg­u­lat­ed under dif­fer­ent leg­is­la­tion.

As I point­ed out in last week’s blog, and as we point­ed out to SIPO on the day, trade unions are reg­u­lat­ed by law (the Trade Unions Acts). Trade Union rules and objec­tives must com­ply with these acts. And they do. For exam­ple Unite’s Rule 2:1:4 states as an objec­tive:

‘To have a strong polit­i­cal voice, fight­ing on behalf of work­ing peo­ples’ inter­ests, and to influ­ence the polit­i­cal agen­da local­ly, region­al­ly, nation­al­ly and inter­na­tion­al­ly, so as to pro­mote a social­ist pro­vi­sion …….for a more equal soci­ety in which wealth is dis­trib­uted from the rich to the poor, includ­ing by means of pro­gres­sive tax­a­tion and oth­er reg­u­la­to­ry mea­sures to restrict exces­sive wealth’.

This isn’t just a per­mis­sion for Unite and its Offi­cers and mem­bers to cam­paign polit­i­cal­ly. It is an oblig­a­tion. And it is an oblig­a­tion leg­is­lat­ed for. It’s a part of who we are and what we do and are estab­lished to do. In short, our trade union role in a cam­paign to pre­vent the pri­vati­sa­tion of our water by the neolib­er­als, and our deter­mi­na­tion to have water paid for through pro­gres­sive gen­er­al tax­a­tion, is not ‘polit­i­cal lob­by­ing’. It is trade union activ­i­ty.

We explained these mat­ters to SIPO face to face, and they had their legal advi­sors present. They may have utter­ly failed to reg­u­late politi­cians but they had the big guns out for Right2Water. I asked them whether they had seen the show the pre­vi­ous Mon­day. There was a sheep­ish silence. Dave asked them, why us? Why were they tar­get­ing Right2Water? He point­ed out that while Right2Water was not ‘an organ­i­sa­tion’ but ‘a cam­paign’, there were plen­ty of actu­al ‘organ­i­sa­tions’ who spent mul­ti­ples of what was spent on Right2Water on actu­al polit­i­cal lob­by­ing, and who didn’t have the pro­tec­tion of the Trade Union Acts yet who weren’t in front of SIPO. What about IBEC? The Amer­i­can Cham­ber of Com­merce, or a mas­sive cam­paign for low­er VAT rates for busi­ness which was then under­way? All of these organ­i­sa­tions and cam­paigns had some­how appar­ent­ly not hit the radar of SIPO at all. ‘How could this be?’ we asked.

‘You must be a vic­tim of your suc­cess’ came the stag­ger­ing response.

We left our ‘vic­tim­hood’ behind and took our ‘suc­cess’ with us as we left by telling SIPO that if they believed that the leg­is­la­tion under which they were required to oper­ate some­how trumped our required role in rule, and in law, to polit­i­cal­ly cam­paign, then they would have to do what they would have to do.

And they did. Let­ters fol­lowed. Strong let­ters. Threats were con­tained in them too about what would hap­pen if we didn’t ‘com­ply’ with their demands. We answered polite­ly but firm­ly, assur­ing them that we would con­tin­ue with our cam­paign­ing. Even­tu­al­ly, they made a for­mal com­plaint to An Gar­da Siochana. As one of two named per­sons of a form in SIPO’s office I was inter­viewed twice. A cou­ple of oth­ers were inter­viewed too. I had our rule book and the Trade Union Acts with me. The Gar­dai (Detec­tives they were as it hap­pened) were very nice. Under­stand­ing. Pro­fes­sion­al. I could per­haps say ‘embar­rassed’, but I can’t read minds. They explained that they would have to send a file to the Direc­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP). I explained that I under­stood. I explained that if the Trade Union Acts were trumped by the leg­is­la­tion enact­ing SIPO, then it was clear­ly a mat­ter for the Courts any­way. Nobody had told the Trade Union move­ment about it though. Nobody had explained this in the Oireach­tas when the leg­is­la­tion was enact­ed. I’m quite sure that there would be noth­ing in the notes, records or tran­scripts of the dis­cus­sions and debates that led to the SIPO leg­is­la­tion being enact­ed that cut across trade unions’ rights to cam­paign in accor­dance with rule and already exist­ing law. And there had been no wide­spread pub­lic con­cern about trade union cam­paign­ing being a con­trib­u­tor to the issues SIPO were estab­lished to address. And nei­ther had there been any Prime­time expose of cor­rup­tion in the trade union move­ment.

Was some­body miss­ing the point?

Any­way, it has come to pass that the DPP has delib­er­at­ed on the mat­ter and that there is no case to answer. The Detec­tives involved have for­mal­ly advised us of this. They have also advised us that SIPO may con­tin­ue to make com­plaints. And so they may.

For my part, I’m look­ing for­ward to the RTE Prime­time Spe­cial out­lin­ing the work done since 2015 to clean up the issues SIPO were set up to pur­sue. After all, if they have spent the same effort going after the tru­ly cor­rupt in Ire­land as they have after trade unions doing their job, it should be some show.

ENDS

Spread the mes­sage